









I am Research Associate at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). I work for the Research And Policy In Development programme (RAPID) and am based in the Philippines and responsible for research and capacity development projects in Southeast Asia and the Pacific region.
Location:
Dumaguete City, Philippines
a.pellini.ra @ odi.org.uk
Mob. +63 920 969 5383
I am a Research Associate at the Research and Policy in Development programme at ODI. My background is in economics with a specialization in decentralization and local governance reforms, community participation in local governance and service provision, in particular education, and evidence-based policy influencing processes. I have more than ten years of field experience at national and local level in Asian countries. I joined ODI in 2008 after two years working with UNDP in Vietnam on a programme to improve research management and policy engagement at the Vietnamese Academy for Social Science. Prior to that, I worked and lived in Nepal and Cambodia with GTZ and DED managing local governance reforms and community development. I have an MPhil in economic development, and a PhD in education and development founded on research on the decentralisation reforms in Cambodia. I have has a good knowledge of the design and monitoring of processes that enable the translation into policies of research evidence. I have acquired extensive experience facilitating meetings, workshops and trainings for governmental and non-governmental actors and am a PRINCE2 and MSP APM qualified project and programme manager. I am currently based in Dumaguete, Philippines
My CV
Technically sound and politically achievable? A taxonomy of knowledge types and their influence on governance in three South-East Asian countries
ODI Background Notes, February 2012
This Background Note classifies different types of knowledge that aim to influence policy, which is then used to analyse case studies from three South-East Asian countries: Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam. The study concludes with suggestions on the usefulness of the development of classifications – a taxonomy – of knowledge types.
Read the paper